Philip R. Ivanov 
Marianа N. Usheva 


The current paper is aimed at investigating and proving the link between motivation and various outcomes such as – a propensity for staying in the company; psychological tension among employees; pride of working in the current company; engagement; work satisfaction; initiative in work. Our main goal is to prove the direct link between, the so-called “match factor” and the work outcomes. The study was held in the form of a survey among two groups, totalling 596 respondents in various sectors of the economy. And the results were tested with regression analysis for proving a significant influence of the match factor. Based on the result testing, we concluded that there is a direct link between motivation and work outcomes.

Keywords: Motivation, work outcomes, workplace motivation

JEL Codes: М12, M54

DOI: 10.37708/el.swu.v3i2.5


Ivanov, P. R., & Usheva, M. N. (2021). Effectivness of work motivation and its influence on work outcomes. Economics & Law3(2), 43-52. DOI: 10.37708/el.swu.v3i2.5
Ivanov, Philip R., and Mariana N. Usheva. 2021. "Effectivness of work motivation and its influence on work outcomes." Economics & Law 3 (2): 43-52. doi: 10.37708/el.swu.v3i2.5
Ivanov, P. R., & Usheva, M. N., 2021. Effectivness of work motivation and its influence on work outcomes. Economics & Law 3(2), pp. 43-52. doi: 10.37708/el.swu.v3i2.5
Ivanov, Philip R., and Mariana N. Usheva. " Effectivness of work motivation and its influence on work outcomes." Economics & Law, vol 3, no.2, 2021, pp. 43-52. doi: 10.37708/el.swu.v3i2.5


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


  1. Alderfer, C. (1969). An empirical test of a new theory of human needs. Organizational behaviour & human performance, 4(2), 142-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(69)90004-X.

  2. Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied psychology: An international review, 51(2), 269-290. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00092.

  3. Belschak, F., & Den Hartog, D. (2009). Consequences of positive and negative feedback: The impact on emotions and extra-role behaviours. Applied psychology: An international Review, 58(2), 274-303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00336.x.

  4. Bipp, T. (2010). What people want from their jobs? The big five, core self-evaluations and work motivation. International journal of selection and assessment, 18, 28-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00486.x.

  5. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2000). The “What” and “Why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychological inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.

  6. Deckers, L. (2010), Motivation: Biological, psychological, and environmental. Boston, MA, Allyn & Bacon.

  7. Dimitrova, M. (2021). Working conditions – a factor for retaining and attracting highly qualified human capital. Leadership, Society, Strategic Visions, 147-164. Retrieved from http://ojs.nbu.bg/ojs/index.php/LSSV/article/view/460.

  8. Dimitrova, R. & Sotirova, A. (2020). Human resource management within the context of innovational development of the enterprise. In: Management – Tourism – Culture, Studies and Reflections on Tourism Management, Ignatianum University Press, Kraków, рр 161-174, ISBN 978-83-7614-468-9.

  9. Filipova, M. (2011). Functional Special Feature in Management of the Tourism Company. SWU Press, Blagoevgrad.

  10. Fong C., Patall, E., Vasquez, A., & Stauberg, S. (2019). A meta-analysis of negative feedback on intrinsic motivation. Educational psychology review 31, 121-162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9446-6.

  11. Gagne, M., & Deci, E. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational behaviour, 26(4), 331-362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322.

  12. Gillet, N., Fouquereau, E., Vallerand, R. J., Abraham, J., & Colombat, P. (2018). The role of workers’ motivational profiles in affective and organizational factors. Journal of happiness studies, 19(4), 1151-1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9867-9.

  13. Herzberg, F. (1968). One more time: How do we motivate employees? Harvard Business Review – January-February, 53-62.

  14. Ivanov, I., & Usheva, M. (2021a). Influence of the hierarchy positon and education degree on the preferences of motivators in the modern enterprise, Economics and Management 18(1), 96-108, doi: 10.37708/em.swu.v18i1.8.

  15. Ivanov, P., & Usheva, M. (2021b). Workplace outcomes, the example of Bulgarian corporations, Ekonomicko-manazerske spektrum, 15(1), 84-96, DOI: dx.doi.org/10.26552/ems.2021.1.84-96.

  16. Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. (2004). Aging, Adult Development, and Work Motivation. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 440-458. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2004.13670969.

  17. Kuvaas B., Buch R., Gagne M., & Dysvik A., Do you get what you pay for? Sales incentives and implications for motivation and changes in turnover intention and work effort. Motivation and emotions 40, 667-680, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-016-9574-6.

  18. Kuvaas, B., Buch, R., Weibel, A., Dysvik, A., & Nerstad, C. (2017). Do intrinsic and extrinsic motivation relate differently to employee outcomes? Journal of Economic Psychology, 61, 244-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2017.05.004.

  19. Latham, G. (2012) Work motivation: History, theory, research and practice, Thousand Oaks, CA: Page Publications, 82-100.

  20. Latham, G., & Pinder, G. (2005). Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the Twenty-First Century. Annual Review Psychology, 56(1), 485-516. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142105.

  21. Lawler, E., & Porter, L. (1967). The Effect of performance on job satisfaction. Industrial Relations, 7(1), 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.1967.tb01060.x.

  22. Locke, E., Latham, G., & Erez, M. (1988) The determinants of goal commitment. The Academy of Management review 13(1), 23-39. https://doi.org/10.2307/258352.

  23. McClelland, D. C. (2013). That urge to achieve. Readings and Exercises in Organizational Behavior, 70-76.

  24. Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and personality. Harper & Row publishers, London.

  25. Olafsen, A., Deci, Е., & Halvari, H. (2017). Basic psychological needs and work motivation: A longitudinal test of directionality. Motivation and emotion 42, 178-189, DOI:10.1007/S11031-017-9646-2.

  26. Oldham, G., & Hackman, J. (1981). Relationships Between Organizational Structure and Employee Reactions: Comparing Alternative Frameworks. Administrative science quarterly, 26(1), 66-83. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2392600?origin=JSTOR-pdf&seq=1.

  27. Pinder, C. (2008). Work motivation in organizational behaviour, New York, Psychology press.

  28. Roe, R., Zinovieva, I., Dienes, E., & Ten Horn, L., A. (2000). A comparison of work motivation in Bulgaria, Hungary and the Netherlands: Test of a model. Applied Psychology: An international review, 49(4), 658-687. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00039.

  29. Van Tuin L., Schafeli W., & Van Rhenen W. (2020). The satisfaction and frustration of basic psychological needs in engaging leadership. Journal of leadership studies, 14(2), 6-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21695.

  30. Van Tuin, L., Schaufeli, W., & Van den Broeck, A. (2021). Engaging leadership: Enhancing work engagement through intrinsic values and need satisfaction. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 1-23. DOI: 10.1002/hrdq.21430.

  31. Wood, R., & Bandura, A. (1989). Social Cognitive theory of organizational management. Academy of management review, 14(3), 361-384. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279067.

  32. World at work. (2019). Inventory of total rewards program & practices. Retrieved from https://worldatwork.org/media/Survey/Survey%20Brief-Total%20Rewards%20Inventory%202019.pdf

  33. Yaneva, D. (2021). Strategic decisions in the management of the marketing activity of the enterprise. University Publishing House “N. Rilski”, Blagoevgrad.

  34. Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. The academy of management review, 53(1), 107-12. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25684309.