Orkhan Hasanov



This article will reveal pros and cons of IPRs on economic advancement, technology, and knowledge diffusion from both developed and LDCs perspective and will provide a correct balance referring to the recent developments and draft papers concerning this sphere. In addressing such enhancements, the article will highlight certain legislations adopted at inter (national) and regional level to establish a fair balance mechanism that will be able to lift problematic issues with the maximum effectiveness. In this respect, opinions and discussions in the academic literature and the studies concluded by the independent organisations also take a great deal of importance, because they may appear as a road map to define the boundaries of holistic/balanced approach to the matter based on the concept of fairness.
The article will deliver an analytical summary of the topic by referring to both primary and secondary academic materials. Increasingly, the applicable legal provisions will be examined, construed and evaluated before being compared and contrasted with other legislative basis using scholarly writing such as books, journal articles and working papers and publications by the relevant authorities. Since the topic has a broad scope, newspaper articles and reliable websites will also be used for the purpose of providing the most recent statistics and updated changes in appropriate places of the Article.

Keywords: Intellectual Property Rights, the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, European Union

JEL Codes: K22, O34

DOI: 10.37708/el.swu.v4i2.4

CITE AS: […]


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


  1. Adelstein. R, & S. Peretz. (1985). The Competition of Technologies in Markets for Ideas: Copyright and Fair Use in Evolutionary Perspective. 5 International Review of Law and Economics, 5, 209-238. Retrieved from

  2. Alden, E. (2005). US to on moves against piracy.  Financial Times 11. Retrieved from

  3. Bagley., M.A. (2003). The Nexus Symposium: An Interdisciplinary Forum on the Impact of International Patent and Trade Agreement in the Fight against HIV and AIDS. Emory Public Law Research Paper,03-14.

  4. Barutciski, M. (2009). NAFTA at 15 Year. Willamette Journal of International Law and Dispute Resolution, 17(1), 94-99. Retrieved from

  5. Binkert, B. (2006). Why the Current Global Intellectual Property Framework under TRIPS is not working. 10 Intell. Prop. L. Bull, 150. Retrieved from

  6. Cavazos-Cepeda, R. H., & Lippoldt, D. (2010). The Strengthening of IPR Protection: Policy Complements. WIPO Journal, 2(1), 99-122. Retrieved from

  7. Chaudhry, P., & Zimmerman, A. (2013). Protecting Your Intellectual Property Rights: Understanding the Role of Management, Governments, Consumers and Pirates. Springer, New York, NY, 7 – 31.

  8. Condon, B. J. (2002). NAFTA, WTO, and Global Business Strategy: How AIDs, Trade, and Terrorism Affect Our Economic Future. Greenwood Publishing Group. Retrieved from

  9. Cooper, J. M. (2012). The North American Free Trade Agreement and Its Legacy on the Resolution of Intellectual Property Disputes. Cal. W. Int’l LJ43, 157.  Retrieved from

  10. De Beer, J., & Bannerman, S. (2010). Foresight into the future of WIPO’s Development Agenda. World Intellectual Property Organization Journal1(2). Retrieved from

  11. De Carvalho, N., P. (2010). The TRIPS regime of patent rights. Kluwer law international.    Retrieved from

  12. Duncan, C. (2002). Out of Conformity: China’s Capacity to Implement World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Body Decisions After Accession. Am. U. Int’l L. Rev.18, 399. Retrieved from

  13. (2009). Pharmaceutical Sector Inquiry Final Report. European Commission. Retrieved from

  14. Finger, J. M., & Schuler, P. (2003). Poor people’s knowledge: promoting intellectual property in developing countries. World Bank Publications. Retrieved from

  15. Fink, C., & Bragaa, C. A. P. (1999). How Stronger Protection of Intellectual Property Rights Affects International Trade Flows. Policy Research Working Papers.

  16. Fink, C., & Maskus, K. E. (2005). Intellectual Property and Development: Lessons from Recent Economic Research. World Bank Publications, 66. Retrieved from 

  17. Gallini, N., & Scotchmer, S. (2002). Intellectual property: when is it the best incentive system? Innovation policy and the economy2, 51-77.

  18. Grigoriadis, L. G. (2014). The application of EU Competition Law in the pharmaceutical sector: the case of parallel trade. European Business Law Review25(1). Retrieved from

  19. Halbert, D. (2011). The politics of IP maximalism. The WIPO Journal, 3(1), 81-93. Retrieved from

  20. Hitt, G. (2005). U.S. resorts to the WTO to press China on piracy. Wall Street Journal Asia 1. Retrieved from

  21. Hu, P. B. & Gomez, B. (2005). Chinese Counterfeits Hurting Industry in China, Experts Say, United States Department of State. Retrieved from 296617.html

  22. Ilias, S., & Fergusson, I., F. (2011). Intellectual Property Rights and International Trade. Congressional Research Service. Retrieved from

  23. Lerner, J. (2002). Patent Protection and Innovation over 150 years.  NBER Working Paper 8977. DOI 10.3386/w8977

  24. Lewis, J., A. (2008). Intellectual Property Protection: Promoting Innovation in a Global Information Economy. CSIS. Retrieved from

  25. Ling Li. (2001). The Sky is High and the Emperor is Far Away: The Embracement of Intellectual Property Law in China, Diss. Stanford U. Retrieved from

  26. Loughran, R. A. (1982). United States Position on Revising the Paris Convention: Quid Pro Quo or Denunciation”. Fordham International Law Journal5, 411. Retrieved from 

  27. Manley, R. (2006). Developmental Perspectives on the Trips and Traditional Knowledge Debate. 3 Macquarie J. Int’l & Comp. Envtl. L. 113-114. Retrieved from

  28. Maskus, K. E. (1998). The Role of Intellectual Property Rights in Encouraging Foreign Direct Investment and Technology Transfer. Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law9(1), 109-162. Retrieved from

  29. Matthews, D. (2003). Globalising intellectual property rights: the TRIPS Agreement. Routledge.

  30. Netanel, N. (Ed.). (2010). The Development Agenda – Global Intellectual Property and Developing CountriesIIC 627. Retrieved from

  31. Ricketson, S. (1987). The Bern Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works:1886-1986. Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary College. Retrieved from

  32. Shi, W. (2008). Intellectual Property in the Global Trading System: EU-China Perspective. Springer Science & Business Media. Retrieved from

  33. Schiappacasse, M. (2003). Intellectual Property Rights in China: Technology Transfers and Economic Development. Buffalo Intellectual Property Law Journal, 2, 164. Retrieved from

  34. Schneider, P. H. (2005). International trade, economic growth and intellectual property rights: A panel data study of developed and developing countries. Journal of Development Economics78(2), 529-547.

  35. Schreibe, U., & Müller, P. (2013). International Company Taxation: An Introduction to the Legal and Economic Principles. Springer Science & Business Media. Retrieved from

  36. The Guardian. (2005). Chung Se-yung. South Korean tycoon behind Hyundai car success. The Guardian.  Retrieved from

  37. USITC. (2011). China: Effects of Intellectual Property Infringement and Indigenous Innovation Policies on the US Economy. Investigation No. 332-519. United States International Trade Commission. Retrieved from

  38. Van Caenegem, W. (2003). Intellectual property law and the idea of progress. Intellectual Property Quarterly, 3, 237-256. Retrieved from

  39. Watters, D. B. (1989). Innovation and Intellectual Property: A Canadian Perspective. Can.-USLJ15, 281. Retrieved from

  40. WIPO. (2001). Deliverables to Sustainable Development of Intellectual Property Systems in the Least Developed Countries (ANEX3), In Intellectual Property Profile of the Least Developed Countries. World Intellectual Property Organization. Retrieved from

  41. WIPO. (2009). World Intellectual Property Indicators – 2009.  World Intellectual Property Organization. Retrieved from

  42. World Bank. (2002). Global Economic Prospects and the Developing Countries 2002. Washington, DC. World Bank. Retrieved from

  43. WTA. (2002). World Trade Organization, Dispute Settlement Reports 2000. Cambridge University Press 5, 2235-2620

  44. Wu, S. E. (2006). Effective Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in China: A Real Possibility. Dartmouth LJ, 4, 30. Retrieved from

  45. Xu, B., & Wang, J. (2000). Trade, FDI, and International Technology Diffusion. Journal of Economic Integration15(4), 585–601.

  46. Yu, P. K. (2010). Enforcement, economics and estimates. WIPO Journal, 2, 1-19.  Retrieved from